Search results

1 – 3 of 3
Article
Publication date: 1 March 2010

5652

Abstract

Details

Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, vol. 22 no. 3
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1096-3367

Article
Publication date: 1 March 2010

Robert M. Purtell and James W. Fossett

Several US states are exploring selling or leasing lotteries to private operators to plug budget gaps and fund new priorities. Given the long-term implications, governors, budget…

Abstract

Several US states are exploring selling or leasing lotteries to private operators to plug budget gaps and fund new priorities. Given the long-term implications, governors, budget officials and legislators need a framework for analyzing lottery-sales' decisions. This paper presents such a framework and illustrates it by estimating likely privatization-proceeds and post-sale cash-flows for six states. Our findings are decidedly mixed. We found pricing expectations reasonable for three states and high for three others. However, even at expected pricing levels, sales or leases make, at best, short- to medium-term financial sense. That does not mean states cannot make use of financial markets and private-public partnerships. We offer structural and contracting options that provide a middle ground for policy makers as they consider increasing lottery proceeds or accelerating collections.

Details

Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, vol. 22 no. 3
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1096-3367

Article
Publication date: 20 June 2016

Helen Kara

– The purpose of this paper is to assess the impact of a mental health carers’ research reference group on mental health research in the Heart of England region.

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to assess the impact of a mental health carers’ research reference group on mental health research in the Heart of England region.

Design/methodology/approach

The methodology was a co-produced participatory evaluation, and the research was co-produced by the group. The design involved a literature review of carers’ involvement in UK mental health research, and collection of secondary data (group records) and primary data from researchers, group members, and facilitators. Analysis was initially thematic, then synthesised.

Findings

The group’s work had a positive impact on researchers and group members, and to some extent on mental health research and networks more widely. No negative impact was identified.

Research limitations/implications

The researchers were not able to contact or include everyone who had been involved with the group. Some of those who did not give input may have felt less positive about the group than those who did respond. Co-production does not signify equality. Evaluation inevitably involves bias.

Practical implications

The conclusion is that mental health carers have a unique and positive contribution to make to mental health research, and have the right to be involved in such research in a non-tokenistic way. This has practical implications for mental health and mental health research services.

Originality/value

This is the first mental health carer-controlled evaluation of a mental health carer research reference group. Mental health carers conducted the research and wrote this paper, giving a perspective rarely found in the literature. This has value for people working in, studying, and researching mental health, and for other mental health carers.

Details

Journal of Public Mental Health, vol. 15 no. 2
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1746-5729

Keywords

1 – 3 of 3